Investing in property through a Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF) has become an increasingly popular option for Australians over the years. With the ability to borrow money and enjoy tax benefits, this investment option provides more control over retirement savings. However, like all investments, it comes with its own set of pros and cons.
The Australian superannuation industry was the fifth-largest in the world in 2021 at US$2.3 trillion. People who choose to manage their super funds themselves get more control over where their money is invested, but they also have to comply with tricky tax rules and legal restraints. An SMSF provides the maximum amount of flexibility when it comes to investing in retirement savings.
Investing through an SMSF provides almost unlimited options for asset types. It allows investors to take their destiny into their own hands and grow their retirement savings in the way they believe is best for their future. SMSF owners can also borrow money to purchase investment properties, which can provide steady monthly income and diversify their investment assets.
However, there are some restrictions to consider when investing in property through an SMSF. For instance, your SMSF can only be used to buy an investment or commercial property. It cannot be used to buy yourself or a family member property or for personal rental purposes.
Selling a property investment can also be complex and time-consuming, and it may cost more than selling shares. Additionally, investors need to be aware of the costs involved in purchasing, maintaining, and selling an investment property. While an investment property should provide a steady monthly income, there may be times when there are no tenants. Furthermore, investors are responsible for maintaining the property over the lifetime of the investment, which will also deduct money from the super fund.
Despite the potential cons, investing in property through an SMSF can be worth it. The tax benefits and ability to borrow money can provide more control over retirement savings, and diversifying investment assets can help reduce risks. However, it is crucial to seek advice from a financial advisor and expert lawyer before making any investment decisions.
Investing in property through an SMSF is a viable option for Australians who want to have more control over their retirement savings. While there are restrictions and costs involved, the potential benefits may outweigh the risks. It is essential to weigh the pros and cons and seek expert advice before making any investment decisions.
Pros
Tax: Earnings within an SMSF are taxed at only 15%, which is significantly less than personal tax rates.
Business: Through an SMSF, one can purchase a commercial property and rent it back to their own business, creating revenue for the SMSF instead of someone else's pocket.
Increased Purchasing Power: Combining capital with other members of an SMSF can provide more purchasing power to invest.
Reduced Capital Gains Tax: Properties held for longer than 12 months can receive a one-third discount on capital gains tax upon the sale, reducing the maximum liability to 10%. Reduced to 0% when in the retirement phase.
Direct Control: An SMSF is the only superannuation structure in which one can directly own property, and investors have control over investment strategies and diversification.
Cons
Limited Personal Benefits: Transactions through an SMSF must be done at arm's length, preventing investors from purchasing property for personal use or for related parties.
Reduced Diversification: A direct property investment can make up the clear majority of an SMSF's underlying investments, increasing the risk of a specialized investment strategy.
Cash Flow Deficiencies: While investors can borrow capital to buy property within an SMSF, they cannot borrow for improvements, potentially leading to cash flow issues.
Complexity: Investing in an SMSF property can be complex, and hefty penalties can result from mistakes. Professional advice is recommended to navigate rules and regulations.
Setup and ongoing Costs: Property investments within an SMSF, particularly those involving legal recourse borrowing agreements (LBRAs), can incur high setup fees and ongoing costs such as tax returns and audits.
Comments